[Python-Dev] String views (was: Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition())
James Y Knight
foom at fuhm.net
Thu Sep 1 04:51:18 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 1 04:51:18 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] String views (was: Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition())
- Next message: [Python-Dev] String views (was: Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition())
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 31, 2005, at 10:21 PM, skip at pobox.com wrote: > > Tim> One of the big disadvantages of string views is that they > need to > Tim> keep the original object around, no matter how big it is. > But in > Tim> the case of partition, much of the time the original string > Tim> survives for at least a similar period to the partitions. > > Not necessarily. Presumably a string view would reference another > string > object's data buffer. A possible optimization would be to convert > from a > view to a normal string once the original strings' refcount dropped > to one, > particularly if the view's size was substantially smaller than that > of the > original string. I suspect this would be a pessimization most of the time, as it would require keeping a list of pointers to all the views referencing the string object. James
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] String views (was: Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition())
- Next message: [Python-Dev] String views (was: Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition())
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list