[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Thu Sep 1 19:56:58 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 1 19:56:58 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote: > > Do we really need writef()? It seems to be not much better than its %- > > formatting > > equivalent. > > Actually, formatting needs to become a function. The overloading of the > arithmetic mod operator has proven to be unfortunate (if only because of > precedence issues). For me, it's not so much the precedence, but the fact that "%s" % x doesn't work as expected if x is a tuple; you'd have to write "%s" % (x,) which is tedious. > Also, the format coding scheme itself needs to be revisited. There is > no shortage of people who have taken issue with the trailing s in > %(myvar)s. Maybe the syntax used in the string.Template class is the way to go? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list