[Python-Dev] Python 3 design principles
JustFillBug
mozbugbox at yahoo.com.au
Fri Sep 2 11:40:09 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Sep 2 11:40:09 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3 design principles
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3 design principles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2005-09-01, Ron Adam <rrr at ronadam.com> wrote: > As for functions without '()'s. (Just a thought) You could use '<<' or > '<<<' (or other symbol) as a way to move data between objects. > > ui.write <<< 'Hello World/n' # ui.write('Hello World/n') > > ui.writeln <<< counter # ui.writeln(counter.next()) > > ok = ui.input <<< 'press a key:' # ok = ui.input('press a key:') > > The requirement could be that the item on the left is a callable, and > the item on the right is a sequence or generator. > Please don't abuse symbols. Perl's ways of symbols all the way without intuitive meaning is bad. Use descriptive methods and functions please.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3 design principles
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3 design principles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list