[Python-Dev] iterators and extended function call syntax (WAS: Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sat Sep 3 19:32:07 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Sep 3 19:32:07 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] iterators and extended function call syntax (WAS: Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] iterators and extended function call syntax (WAS: Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/3/05, Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: > > I actually hope that extended function call syntax in Py3k will > > use iterators rather than tuples so that this problem goes away. > > I suggested this a while back on the Python list: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2004-December/257282.html > > Raymond Hettinger brought up a few pretty valid complaints, [...] What he said. There's no way this is going to happen. If you want to have a function that takes an iterator and you want to pass it an iterator, just do that -- don't use the *args notation. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] iterators and extended function call syntax (WAS: Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] iterators and extended function call syntax (WAS: Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list