[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sat Sep 3 19:37:57 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Sep 3 19:37:57 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/3/05, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, it's an ordering quirk in the parser - the extended call syntax > stuff has to come last in the function call, which means we need to put the > keyword arguments at the front: > > Py> writeln(sep=', ', *(x*x for x in range(10))) > 0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81 > > I personally believe keyword arguments should be allowed between *args and > **kwds at the call site, and keyword-only arguments after * in the function > definition, but the current behaviour has never bothered me enough for me to > look into what would be required to change it. Same here. If anyone wants to give it a try, please go ahead! -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list