Bill Janssen janssen at parc.com
Sun Sep 4 00:17:23 CEST 2005

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

> To me, the main objection seems to revolve around the fact that people would 
> like to be able to "future-proof" Python 2.x code so that it will also run on 
> Py3k.

Nick,

You seem to be dreaming.  People like the "print" statement for many
and varied reasons, it seems.  Skip's point about gratuitous breakage
is one good argument for retaining it, but by no means the main
argument.

Bill

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list