[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettinger at verizon.net
Sun Sep 4 19:34:26 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Sep 4 19:34:26 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Barry] > Actually, we probably only /need/ printf(), and certainly for C > programmers (are there any of us left? ;), I think that would be a small > conceptual leap. The motivation for keeping a non-formatting version is > for simple cases, and beginners -- both of which use cases should not be > dismissed. +1 on Barry's proposal for two functions, one formatted and one plain. However, I take issue with the premise that beginners do not need formatting. Almost anyone, beginner or not, needs formatting when they are working on a real application. My experience is that finance people immediately try to format their output (habits from Excel). Most are astonished at how non-trivial it is to add commas, dollar signs, brackets, and a fixed number of decimal places. So, I think beginners should be considered a key constituent for output formatting and that their needs should be accommodated as simply and broadly as possible. Raymond Finance Guy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list