[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
Martin Blais
martin.blais at gmail.com
Sun Sep 4 19:59:13 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Sep 4 19:59:13 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/4/05, Tony Meyer <t-meyer at ihug.co.nz> wrote: > > Yes. If it didn't have the redirect stuff; I would like it more if it also > didn't have the trailing comma magic. "print" is a fundamental; it deserves > to be a statement :) I don't know exactly what you mean by "fundamental", in opposition to your statement, I just see it as oft-used application-level code that should not live in "the language" (the set of statements that defines control flow and basic data structures) per-se, but in a library.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list