[Python-Dev] Simplify the file-like-object interface (Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Sep 6 13:22:35 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Sep 6 13:22:35 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Simplify the file-like-object interface (Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fredrik Lundh wrote: > (you completely missed the point -- today's print mechanism works on *any* object > that implements a "write" method, no just file objects. saying that "oh, all you need is > to add a method" or "here's a nice mixin" doesn't give you a print replacement) While we're on the subject, in Py3k I'd like to see readline(), readlines(), etc. removed from file objects and made builtin functions instead. It should only be necessary to implement read() and write() to get a file-like object having equal status with all others. Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Simplify the file-like-object interface (Replacement for print in Python 3.0)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list