[Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake at acm.org
Wed Sep 21 00:03:30 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 21 00:03:30 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Next message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 17:49, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I realize that this was a deliberate feature, and that it exists in > 2.4 as well as in 2.4.1 and will in 2.4.2; yet, I'm not sure I *like* I wasn't paying any attention at the time, so I don't know what was discussed. Some discussion here just now leads me to believe that at least two of us here (including myself) think iterators shouldn't have length at all: they're *not* containers and shouldn't act that way. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Next message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list