[Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
Delaney, Timothy (Tim)
tdelaney at avaya.com
Wed Sep 21 01:23:53 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 21 01:23:53 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding a conditional expression in Py3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 17:49, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I realize that this was a deliberate feature, and that it exists in > > 2.4 as well as in 2.4.1 and will in 2.4.2; yet, I'm not sure I > *like* > > I wasn't paying any attention at the time, so I don't know what was > discussed. Some discussion here just now leads me to believe that at > least two of us here (including myself) think iterators shouldn't > have length at all: they're *not* containers and shouldn't act that > way. In any case, it's simple to get the 2.3 behaviour back - just add __nonzero__. I think that could validly be considered a bugfix. Tim Delaney
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding a conditional expression in Py3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list