[Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Thu Sep 22 05:14:12 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 22 05:14:12 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Next message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/21/05, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote: > [Guido van Rossum] > > Could you at least admit that this was an oversight and not try to > > pretend it was intentional breakage? > > Absolutely. I completely missed this one. Thanks; spoken like a man. I strongly feel that this needs to be corrected in 2.5. Iterators should have neither __len__ nor __nonzero__. I see mostly agreement that this is a misfeature. We don't really want to start writing code like this: while it: x = it.next() ...process x... when we can already write it like this: for x in it: ...process x... do we? Keeping a special API to allow a more efficient implementation of __reversed__ is fine. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Next message: [Python-Dev] bool(iter([])) changed between 2.3 and 2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list