[Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
Evgeniy Khramtsov
xramtsov at gmail.com
Sat Dec 23 07:53:25 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Dec 23 07:53:25 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Klaas пишет: > I'm not sure how having python execute code at an arbitrary time would > _reduce_ race conditions and/or deadlocks. And if you want to make it > safe by executing code that shares no variables or resources, then it > is no less safe to use threads, due to the GIL. > Ok. And what about a huge thread overhead? Just try to start 10-50k threading timers :) > If you can write you application in an event-driven way, Twisted might > be able to do what you are looking for. I don't like an idea of Twisted: you want the banana, but get the whole gorilla as well :)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list