[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r53110 - python/trunk/Lib/mailbox.py
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake at acm.org
Sat Dec 23 07:59:08 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Dec 23 07:59:08 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r53110 - python/trunk/Lib/mailbox.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r53110 - python/trunk/Lib/mailbox.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday 21 December 2006 15:23, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Now it seem that introducing them has the unfortunate side effect > that people think they *have* to use them, and that doing so gives > better code... Speaking strictly for myself: I don't think I *have* to use them, but I do prefer to use them because I don't like magic constants that affect what a function does in code; I'd rather have a named constant for readability's sake. Maybe I just can't keep enough in my head, but I don't find I actually use seek() enough to remember what the numeric values mean with checking the reference documentation. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r53110 - python/trunk/Lib/mailbox.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r53110 - python/trunk/Lib/mailbox.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list