[Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
Evgeniy Khramtsov
xramtsov at gmail.com
Sat Dec 23 08:03:23 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Dec 23 08:03:23 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Josiah Carlson пишет: >writing of a scheduler and the execution of scheduled tasks in a >scheduler? If so, you can implement it today (I would suggest using the >heapq module, and/or the pair heap I posted to this list a few weeks ago), >or you can use a previously existing mainloop for handling events >(wx.App().MainLoop() works well, you just need to write a wx.EvtHandler >subclass). > I did a dirty hack in the asyncore.py module, and now my asyncore objects have methods for timers (self.start_timer, self.cancel_timer, etc.) But I think that timer scheduling is a job for a python interpreter and it must be hidden from an end programmer. Regards.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Non-blocking (asynchronous) timer without thread?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list