Mike Rovner mrovner at propel.com
Thu Feb 2 22:28:40 CET 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Andrew Koenig wrote:
>>I definately agree with the 0c664 octal literal. Seems rather more
>>intuitive.
> 
> 
> I still prefer 8r664.

664[8] looks better and allows any radix

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list