[Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Feb 5 02:26:19 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Feb 5 02:26:19 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Duncan Booth wrote: > I'm not convinced by the rationale given why atime,ctime,mtime and size are > methods rather than properties but I do find this PEP much more agreeable > than the last time I looked at it. A better rationale for doing it is that all of them may raise IOException. It's rude for properties to do that, so it's better to make them methods instead. That was a general guideline that came up the first time adding Path was proposed - if the functionality involved querying or manipulating the actual filesystem (and therefore potentially raising IOError), then it should be a method. If the operation related solely to the string representation, then it could be a property. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list