[Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sun Feb 5 21:43:57 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Feb 5 21:43:57 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/5/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > After so many attempts to come up with an alternative for lambda, > perhaps we should admit defeat. I've not had the time to follow the > most recent rounds, but I propose that we keep lambda, so as to stop > wasting everybody's talent and time on an impossible quest. +1 The recently suggested keyword change, from lambda to expr (as in '''expr x, y: x+y''') looks like an improvement to me, but I suspect opening up the possibility of a keyword change would simply restart all the discussions... (Nevertheless, I'd be +1 on lambda being renamed to expr, if it was an option). Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list