[Python-Dev] Let's send lambda to the shearing shed (Re: Let's just *keep* lambda)
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Feb 9 04:41:10 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Feb 9 04:41:10 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's send lambda to the shearing shed (Re: Let's just *keep* lambda)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
My thought on lambda at the moment is that it's too VERBOSE. If a syntax for anonymous functions is to pull its weight, it needs to be *very* concise. The only time I ever consider writing a function definition in-line is when the body is extremely short, otherwise it's clearer to use a def instead. Given that, I do *not* have the space to waste with 6 or 7 characters of geeky noise-word. So my vote for Py3k is to either 1) Replace lambda args: value with args -> value or something equivalently concise, or 2) Remove lambda entirely. -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's send lambda to the shearing shed (Re: Let's just *keep* lambda)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list