Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Tue Feb 14 00:40:16 CET 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Phillip J. Eby wrote:
[snip..]
>
> In fact, the 'encoding' argument seems useless in the case of str objects, 
> and it seems it should default to latin-1 for unicode objects.  The only 
>   
-1 for having an implicit encode that behaves differently to other 
implicit encodes/decodes that happen in Python. Life is confusing enough 
already.

Michael Foord

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list