Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Tue Feb 14 01:09:32 CET 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 2/13/06, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
> Sorry - I meant for the unicode to bytes case. A default encoding that
> behaves differently to the current to implicit encodes/decodes would be
> confusing IMHO.

And I am in agreement with you there (I think only Phillip argued otherwise).

> I agree that string to bytes shouldn't change the value of the bytes.

It's a deal then.

Can the owner of PEP 332 update the PEP to record these decisions?

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list