[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Feb 14 11:59:04 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Feb 14 11:59:04 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote: > I also wonder if having a b"..." literal would just add more confusion > -- bytes are not characters, but b"..." makes it appear as if they > are. I'm inclined to agree. Bytes objects are more likely to be used for things which are *not* characters -- if they're characters, they would be better kept in strings or char arrays. +1 on any eventual bytes literal looking completely different from a string literal. Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list