[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Feb 14 12:35:17 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Feb 14 12:35:17 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Barry Warsaw wrote: > This makes me think I want an unsigned byte type, which b[0] would > return. Come to think of it, this is something I don't remember seeing discussed. I've been thinking that bytes[i] would return an integer, but is the intention that it would return another bytes object? Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list