[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
Adam Olsen
rhamph at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 06:20:16 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Feb 15 06:20:16 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] byte literals unnecessary [Was: PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/14/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > Not entirely, since I don't know what b"abc<euro>def" would mean > (where <euro> is a Unicode Euro character typed in whatever source > encoding was used). SyntaxError I would hope. Ascii and hex escapes only please. :) Although I'm not arguing for or against byte literals. They do make for a much terser form, but they're not strictly necessary. -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] byte literals unnecessary [Was: PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list