[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
Josiah Carlson
jcarlson at uci.edu
Wed Feb 15 20:25:01 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Feb 15 20:25:01 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ron Adam <rrr at ronadam.com> wrote: > Greg Ewing wrote: > > Ron Adam wrote: > >> b = bytes(0L) -> bytes([0,0,0,0]) > > > > No, bytes(0L) --> TypeError because 0L doesn't implement > > the iterator protocol or the buffer interface. > > It wouldn't need it if it was a direct C memory copy. Yes it would. Python long integers are stored as arrays of signed 16-bit short ints. See longintrepr.h from the source. - Josiah
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list