[Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
Thomas Wouters
thomas at xs4all.net
Fri Feb 17 17:41:11 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Feb 17 17:41:11 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 05:29:32PM +0100, Armin Rigo wrote: > > Where obj must be either an int or a long or another object that has the > > __index__ special method (but not self). > The "anything but not self" rule is not consistent with any other > special method's behavior. IMHO we should just do the same as > __nonzero__(): > * __nonzero__(x) must return exactly a bool or an int. Yes, very much so. And in case people worry that this makes wrapping objects harder: proxy objects (for instance) would do 'return operator.index(self._real)'. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list