[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
Adam Olsen
rhamph at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 23:56:24 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Feb 17 23:56:24 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/17/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On 2/17/06, Adam Olsen <rhamph at gmail.com> wrote: > > It's also makes it harder to read code. You may expect d[key] to > > raise an exception, but it won't because of a single line up several > > pages (or in another file entierly!) > > Such are the joys of writing polymorphic code. I don't really see how > you can avoid this kind of confusion -- I could have given you some > other mapping object that does weird stuff. You could pass a float in as well. But if the function is documented as taking a dict, and the programmer expects a dict.. that now has to be changed to "dict without a default". Or they have to code defensively since d[key] may or may not raise KeyError, so they must avoid depending on it either way. -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list