[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
Josiah Carlson
jcarlson at uci.edu
Sun Feb 19 04:50:07 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Feb 19 04:50:07 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Bengt Richter wrote: > > > My guess is that realistically default_factory will be used > > to make clean code for filling a dict, and then turning the factory > > off if it's to be passed into unknown contexts. > > This suggests that maybe the autodict behaviour shouldn't > be part of the dict itself, but provided by a wrapper > around the dict. > > The you can fill the dict through the wrapper, and still > have a normal dict underneath to use for other purposes. I prefer this to changing dictionaries directly. The actual wrapper could sit in the collections module, ready for subclassing/replacement of the on_missing method. - Josiah
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list