[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
Raymond Hettinger
python at rcn.com
Sun Feb 19 04:53:35 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Feb 19 04:53:35 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Also, I think has_key/in should return True if there is a default. > It certainly seems desirable to see True where d[some_key] > doesn't raise an exception, but one could argue either way. Some things can be agreed by everyone: * if __contains__ always returns True, then it is a useless feature (since scripts containing a line such as "if k in dd" can always eliminate that line without affecting the algorithm). * if defaultdicts are supposed to be drop-in dict substitutes, then having __contains__ always return True will violate basic dict invariants: del d[some_key] assert some_key not in d Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list