[Python-Dev] defaultdict proposal round three
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at gmail.com
Tue Feb 21 16:52:22 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Feb 21 16:52:22 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict proposal round three
- Next message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict proposal round three
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 21, 2006, at 1:51 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
...
> Just one more thing -- have you made a final decision
> about the name yet? I'd still prefer something like
> 'autodict', because to me 'defaultdict' suggests
autodict is shorter and sharper and I prefer it, too: +1
> etc.) it seems more accurate to think of the value
> produced by the factory as an 'initial value' rather
> than a 'default value', and I'd prefer to see it
If we call the type autodict, then having the factory attribute named
autofactory seems to fit. This leaves it open to the reader's
imagination to choose whether to think of the value as "initial" or
"default" -- it's the *auto* (automatic) value.
Alex
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict proposal round three
- Next message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict proposal round three
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list