[Python-Dev] PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes
Mark Russell
mrussell at verio.net
Tue Feb 21 23:56:34 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Feb 21 23:56:34 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 21 Feb 2006, at 21:13, Ian Bicking wrote: > By rebinding operator, does that mean it is actually an operator? > I.e.: > > # Required assignment to declare?: > chunk = None > while chunk := f.read(1000): > ... No, I think that "x := y" should be a statement not an expression (i.e. just like "x = y" apart from the treatment of bindings). I'd be inclined to require that the target of := be already bound, if only to prevent people randomly using ":=" in places where it's not required. In a new language I would probably also make it an error to use = to do rebinding (i.e. insist on = for new bindings, and := for rebindings). But that's obviously not reasonable for python. Mark Russell
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list