[Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sat Feb 25 01:28:34 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Feb 25 01:28:34 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Raymond Hettinger wrote: > Code that > uses next() is more understandable, friendly, and readable without the > walls of underscores. There wouldn't be any walls of underscores, because y = x.next() would become y = next(x) The only time you would need to write underscores is when defining a __next__ method. That would be no worse than defining an __init__ or any other special method, and has the advantage that it clearly marks the method as being special. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list