M.-A. Lemburg mal at egenix.com
Tue Jun 6 16:59:43 CEST 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> 
>> I just had an idea: if we could get each test to run
>> inside a single time slice assigned by the OS scheduler,
>> then we could benefit from the better resolution of the
>> hardware timers while still keeping the noise to a
>> minimum.
>>
>> I suppose this could be achieved by:
>>
>> * making sure that each tests needs less than 10ms to run
> 
> iirc, very recent linux kernels have a 1 millisecond tick.  so does 
> alphas, and probably some other platforms.

Indeed, that's also what the microbench.py example that I posted
demonstrates.

And of, course, you have to call time.sleep() *before* running
the test (which microbench.py does).

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Jun 06 2006)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list