[Python-Dev] Pre-PEP: Allow Empty Subscript List Without Parentheses
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sat Jun 10 01:48:22 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Jun 10 01:48:22 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pre-PEP: Allow Empty Subscript List Without Parentheses
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Pre-PEP: Allow Empty Subscript List Without Parentheses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Noam Raphael wrote: > This PEP suggests to allow the use of an empty subscript list, for > example ``x[]``, which is currently a syntax error. It is suggested > that in such a case, an empty tuple will be passed as an argument to > the __getitem__ and __setitem__ methods. This is consistent with the > current behaviour of passing a tuple with n elements to those methods > when a subscript list of length n is used, if it includes a comma. It's not, really -- unless other places where a tuple can appear were changed likewise, e.g. x = would have to assign an empty tuple to x, etc. > But you may also have several > zero-dimensional arrays, that is, single values - for example, the > income tax rate. But *why* do these need to be 0-dimensional arrays rather than just scalars? I'm having trouble seeing any use for such a distinction. I'm particularly unconvinced by the spreadsheet argument. In that context, I'd say that everything is a 2-D array, and a single cell is a 1x1 2-D array, not a 0-D array. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pre-PEP: Allow Empty Subscript List Without Parentheses
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Pre-PEP: Allow Empty Subscript List Without Parentheses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list