[Python-Dev] Scoping vs augmented assignment vs sets (Re: 'fast locals' in Python 2.5)
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Jun 14 16:50:05 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jun 14 16:50:05 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Scoping vs augmented assignment vs sets (Re: 'fast locals' in Python 2.5)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Scoping vs augmented assignment vs sets (Re: 'fast locals' in Python 2.5)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Boris Borcic" <bborcic at gmail.com> wrote in message news:e6on1i$bvc$1 at sea.gmane.org... Terry Reedy wrote: >> Your transformation amounted to switching from collection mutation to >> object rebinding. In Python, that is a crucial difference. >Ok, that is a crucial difference. The question becomes : is that >difference in >the case of augmented assignment maintained for practical or for purity >aka >ideological reasons ? Consistency. a op=b is almost the same as a = a op b except 1) 'a' is computed only once and 2) if a is mutable, type(a) may choose to do op in place via the call to __iop__ instead of __op__. But in any case, the assigment is made and 'a', if a name, is bound to the result. Anyway, this will not change for 2.x and further discussion is really c.l.p. material. Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Scoping vs augmented assignment vs sets (Re: 'fast locals' in Python 2.5)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Scoping vs augmented assignment vs sets (Re: 'fast locals' in Python 2.5)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list