Benji York benji at benjiyork.com
Mon Jun 19 19:27:40 CEST 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Code coverage reporting.
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Code coverage reporting.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Brett Cannon wrote:
> Ah, do the union of the coverage!  Yeah, that would be nice and give the 
> most accurate coverage data in terms of what is actually being tested.  
> But as Titus says in another email, question is how to get that data 
> sent back to be correlated against.

It might be interesting as a BuilBot extension: you already know the 
definitive identity of the thing that you're running (svn path and 
revision), a central server with established communication channel, plus 
all the other BuildBot machinery.
--
Benji York

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Code coverage reporting.
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Code coverage reporting.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list