Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve rwgk at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 24 10:22:11 CEST 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

--- "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:

> Scott David Daniels wrote:
> > I am not sure about your compiler, but if I remember the standard
> > correctly, the following code shouldn't complain:
> > 
> >     PyObject_CallFunction((PyObject*) (void *) &PyRange_Type,
> >                           "lll", start, start+len*step, step)
> 
> You remember the standard incorrectly.

There are three standards to consider: C89/90, C99, C++97/98. Here you can find
the opinion of one of the authors of the C++ standard in this matter:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/c++-sig/2005-December/009869.html


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list