Giovanni Bajo rasky at develer.com
Tue Jun 27 18:32:22 CEST 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 328 and PEP 338, redux
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 328 and PEP 338, redux
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Phillip J. Eby wrote:

> Actually, maybe we *do* want to, for this usage.
>
> Note that until Python 2.5, it was not possible to do "python -m
> nested.module", so this change merely prevents *existing* modules from
> being run this way -- when they could not have been before!
>
> So, such modules would require a minor change to run under -m.  Is
> this
> actually a problem, or is it a new feature?

This is where I wonder why the "def __main__()" PEP was rejected in the
first place. It would have solved this problem as well.
-- 
Giovanni Bajo

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 328 and PEP 338, redux
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 328 and PEP 338, redux
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list