Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Jun 28 02:02:54 CEST 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Semantic of isinstance
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Semantic of isinstance
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Martin v. Löwis wrote:

> Again, I believe this is all included for ExtensionClasses: it looks
> for __class__ on the object if the type check fails, so that an
> ExtensionClass could be actually a class derived from the C type.

Now that we have had new-style classes for quite a
while, is there still a need to support ExtensionClasses?

--
Greg

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Semantic of isinstance
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Semantic of isinstance
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list