[Python-Dev] Proposal to eliminate PySet_Fini
Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Thu Jun 29 18:47:30 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jun 29 18:47:30 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to eliminate PySet_Fini
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to eliminate PySet_Fini
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fredrik Lundh <fredrik <at> pythonware.com> writes: > given that CPython has about a dozen Fini functions, what exactly is it > that makes PySet_Fini so problematic ? > I have not been bitten by the other _Fini yet. ;-) I was bitten by PySet_Fini when I tried to replace the "interned" dict with a set. Since setobject is finalized before stringobject, interpretor crashed when cleaning "interned". I feel that set is a more basic object than dict, but dictobject module is never finalized (is this a bug or a feature?), so dict api functions are always safe. For example, I can use dict API in atexit callbacks, but not set API.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to eliminate PySet_Fini
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to eliminate PySet_Fini
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list