[Python-Dev] C++ for CPython 3? (Re: str.count is slow)
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Mar 2 18:40:00 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 2 18:40:00 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] C++ for CPython 3? (Re: str.count is slow)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] C++ for CPython 3? (Re: str.count is slow)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "martin" == martin <martin at v.loewis.de> writes: martin> There are a few advantages [to C++], though, mainly: martin> - increased type-safety, in particular for API that isn't martin> type-checked at all at the moment (e.g. PyArg_ParseTuple) That's merely an advantage to having a C++ *compiler*. No need to actually use the C++ *language*. :-) XEmacs has had a policy of compiling without warnings under *both* C and C++ for about 5 years now, and it catches a lot of stupidity before it leaves the developer's sandbox. The feature programmers are occasionally annoyed that a pet C idiom gets disallowed, but that's the only downside we've experienced. -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] C++ for CPython 3? (Re: str.count is slow)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] C++ for CPython 3? (Re: str.count is slow)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list