Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Tue Mar 7 22:56:11 CET 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] str(Exception) changed, is that intended?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] str(Exception) changed, is that intended?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 13:35 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> IMO it shouldn't be fixed. Classic classes define their str to print
> the module name and class name with a dot in between; new-style
> classes use the same format as their repr. Making exceptions new-style
> classes is going to break a number of things; that's just inevitable.

What else do you expect to break?  Should we at least try to describe
expected breakage in PEP 352?

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060307/a3b91d14/attachment.pgp 

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] str(Exception) changed, is that intended?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] str(Exception) changed, is that intended?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list