[Python-Dev] Another threading idea
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Tue Mar 14 23:28:26 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 14 23:28:26 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Another threading idea
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Another threading idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/14/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > Isn't this a job for threading.BoundedSpemaphore()? Not sure I see how. What I think Raymond's after (and certainly what I want) is to queue N tasks, set a counter to N, then wait until the counter goes to zero. I suppose counter = Semaphore(-N) # Queue N tasks counter.acquire() with each task (or the queue) saying counter.release() when it finishes. But the logic seems backwards, and highly prone to off-by-one errors, and I'm not entirely convinced that a negative semaphore value is officially supported... (BoundedSemaphore seems a red herring here - the blocking semantics of Semaphore and BoundedSemaphore are identical). Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Another threading idea
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Another threading idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list