[Python-Dev] towards a stricter definition of sys.executable
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Mar 16 23:25:39 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 16 23:25:39 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] towards a stricter definition of sys.executable
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Switch to MS VC++ 2005 ?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 12:02 +0100, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > a) sys.executable points to the executable that was used to load the > Python interpreter library/dll. > > this use is supported by the docstring and the implementation, and is quite > common in the wild. an application using this interpretation may > > - call sys.executable to run another instance of itself > - extract data from resources embedded in (or attached to) sys.executable > - locate configuration data etc via os.path.dirname(sys.executable) Yep, that's how our embedded apps use sys.executable. > to fix this, I propose adding another sys variable; for example, let sys.executable > keep behaving like case (a) (which is how it's implemented today), and add a new > sys.python_executable for case (b). the latter can then be set to None if a proper > interpreter cannot be located. As long as sys.executable behaving like a) doesn't change, that seems fine with me. ;) -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 309 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060316/62ca093a/attachment.pgp
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] towards a stricter definition of sys.executable
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Switch to MS VC++ 2005 ?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list