[Python-Dev] PEP 342 support for string exceptions in throw()
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Mar 24 23:56:39 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Mar 24 23:56:39 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 342 support for string exceptions in throw()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 342 support for string exceptions in throw()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 02:36 PM 3/24/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: >I think it's overkill to warn for any string exceptions thrown this >way. Since the only use case for using throw() is to pass an exception >you just caught, I don't see that putting the warning is useful -- >it's just more code that in practice is never triggered. My proposal was that throw() should only succeed or fail, never warn. If you throw() a string exception with a traceback, it Just Works. If you throw() a string exception without a traceback, you get an immediate TypeError, just like in the 2.5 trunk now. Is that acceptable? i.e., was that what you were "-0"-ing? The only change is that throw() would now *accept* string exceptions without warning or error, if and only if you supply a traceback. That is, if you are effectively re-raising an existing exception.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 342 support for string exceptions in throw()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 342 support for string exceptions in throw()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list