[Python-Dev] Prevalence of low-level memory abuse?
Adam DePrince
adam.deprince at gmail.com
Mon Mar 27 06:35:05 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Mar 27 06:35:05 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Prevalence of low-level memory abuse?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] daily releases?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 18:58 -0500, Tim Peters wrote: > [Edward Loper] > > Could the debug build's macros for PyMem/PyObject_new/free be modified > > to check for mismatches? Or would storing information about which > > method was used to allocate each pointer be too expensive? Perhaps a > > special build could be used to check for mismatches? > > It's partly possible (e.g., it's impossible to know whether a blob of > memory was obtained by calling malloc() directly). > > If someone wants to do it (I do not), the debug build adds 8 bytes to > each side of each memory block obtained via each PyMem and PyObject > malloc/realloc call, and one of the (current) 8 FORBIDDEN_BYTEs could > be used to store flags without significant loss of functionality. It > would make a decent enhancement. Sounds fun. I'll do it. - Adam DePrince > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/adam.deprince%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Prevalence of low-level memory abuse?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] daily releases?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list