[Python-Dev] What about PEP 299?
Charles Cazabon
python at discworld.dyndns.org
Wed Mar 29 00:44:00 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 29 00:44:00 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] What about PEP 299?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] What about PEP 299?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On 3/28/06, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > > since I found myself writing "if __name__ == '__main__'" > > often these days, I wondered whether PEP 299 could be pronounced > > upon. I'm not proposing putting it into 2.5, but it should be > > relatively small a change. > > If you're asking for a quick pronouncement, it's going to be "no". > It's not worth the change (in docs, user habits, etc.) and there's > nothing particularly broken. It might be worth instead adding an option flag to the executable that implies "from the loaded module, run __main__() with sys.argv as its argument(s)", so the user can get this behaviour with `python -X somemodule.py`. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <python at discworld.dyndns.org> GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] What about PEP 299?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] What about PEP 299?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list