[Python-Dev] Class decorators
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Mar 29 04:55:32 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 29 04:55:32 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Class decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Class decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Phillip J. Eby wrote: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043462.html > Or more precisely, the subsequent discussion and examples convinced me that > putting class decorators on top of the class was bad for readability, vs. > putting them in the body just after the docstring. I just looked at that discussion, and I didn't see any argument to refute the thesis that if decorators-on-top is good enough for functions, it should be good enough for classes. In fact it seems to have been written before the on-top decorator syntax existed, so there's no discussion of the issue at all. Seems to me that, since we now already have @-decorators for functions, a *very* good reason will be needed for requiring a completely different syntax to get exactly the same effect for classes. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Class decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Class decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list