Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Wed Mar 29 20:06:11 CEST 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Bill Janssen wrote:
>> I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in 
>> the standard library.
> 
> Which doesn't make it a good idea.  +1 on adding longer top-level
> package names as aliases for existing shorter top-level package names.

Which existing short names do you have in mind? os? xml? email?
Let's not get excited over names here.

I say: let the RM or the BDFL, whoever feels responsible to pronounce whether
PySQLite actually gets in, decide which name it will have.

Georg

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list