Bill Janssen janssen at parc.com
Thu Mar 30 00:14:02 CEST 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

> from a user perspective, adding this to the standard library is a no-brainer.
> the only reason not to add it would be if the release managers don't have
> time to sort out the build issues.

I agree with Fredrik here.

On the package naming issue: using "em" for "email" would be wrong,
just as "db" for "database" would be wrong.  I might change my mind if
all stdlib packages were under some toplevel package, like "stdlib".

Bill

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list